Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services: CNE Activity
Home
Online Advanced Release
Articles for CNE credits
current issue
back issues
about the journal
contact us
advertising info
article reprints
article submission
buy a book
terms and conditions  
Careers at SLACK Inc.
 
 e-contents - sign up today
subscribe to the journal
 
find a job: NursePath.com

Advance your career.

CNE Activity

Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services   Vol. 47 No. 9   September 2009



Privacy System Contact us

Mental Health Needs in a Post-Disaster Environment

Gary Milligan, MSN, MSHA; and Teena M. McGuinness, PhD, PMH-NP, BC

ABSTRACT

Maintenance of a daily routine, which includes scheduled medications, access to a health care provider, and a stable environment, forms an anchor point in the lives of people diagnosed with mental illness. When a disaster, either man made or natural, interferes with these, patients often experience an acute exacerbation of their illness. Efforts to mitigate the ensuing disruption require a contingency plan in the event of a disaster; a plan ensuring access to medications, health information, and caregiver stability, allows those with mental illness to continue to function at an acceptable level. Recent world events, such as the Asian Tsunami in 2004 and Hurricane Katrina in 2005, indicate that minimal research exists regarding the magnitude of the effects of disasters on those with mental illness. A review of the literature indicates that the impact on survivors’ mental well-being is directly related to the level of exposure to a disaster. Mental health professionals must include crisis management, planning, and communication in pre- and post-disaster interventions with people who have mental illness.

AUTHORS

Mr. Milligan is Instructor, Community and Mental Health Nursing, and Dr. McGuinness is Professor of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Nursing, Birmingham, Alabama.

The authors disclose that they have no significant financial interests in any product or class of products discussed directly or indirectly in this activity, including research support.

Address correspondence to Gary Milligan, MSN, MSHA, Instructor, Community and Mental Health Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Nursing, NB 352, 1530 3rd Avenue South, Birmingham, AL 35294-1210; e-mail: gmillig@uab.edu.

doi:10.3928/02793695-20090731-01



Behavioral Management of Auditory Hallucinations: Implementation and Evaluation of a 10-Week Course

Martha D. Buffum, DNSc, RN, PMHCNS-BC; Robin Buccheri, DNSc, RN, PMHNP; Louise Trygstad, DNSc, RN, CNS; April A. Gerlock, PhD, ARNP, PMHNP-BC, PMHCNS-BC; Patricia Birmingham, MS, RN; Glenna A. Dowling, PhD, RN, FAAN; and Gloria J. Kuhlman, DNSc, RN, CNS

ABSTRACT

A 10-session behavioral course for self-management of auditory hallucinations in patients with schizophrenia has demonstrated positive outcomes. This article evaluates both the course’s implementation and benefits to patients attending the course. Teleconferencing, electronic media, and 26 monthly conference calls were used to educate six advanced practice nurses (APNs) at six sites about the course implementation. Thirty-two patients within the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs participated in the course. All of the APNs reported course helpfulness, improved communication with patients about voices, and improved harm assessment. Of the patients, 96% found the course helpful: 67% no longer heard voices to harm self or others, and 60% had improved auditory hallucination intensity scores. The project demonstrated successful implementation and practice integration with APNs’ activities corresponding to Rogers’ stages of innovation adoption. Facilitators and barriers to implementation are also described.

AUTHORS

Dr. Buffum is Associate Chief Nurse for Research, and Ms. Birmingham is Fee Clinical Reviewer, VA Medical Center, Dr. Buccheri is Professor, and Dr. Trygstad is Professor Emerita, University of San Francisco, School of Nursing, Dr. Dowling is Professor and Chair, Department of Physiological Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California; Dr. Gerlock is Psychiatric Nurse Practitioner, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, and Clinical Associate Professor, University of Washington, School of Nursing, Seattle, Washington; and Dr. Kuhlman was formerly Clinical Nurse Specialist, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park Division, Menlo Park, California. In addition, Dr. Buffum is Associate Clinical Professor, and Ms. Birmingham is a doctoral student, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.

The authors disclose that they have no significant financial interests in any product or class of products discussed directly or indirectly in this activity. This material is the result of work supported with resources and the use of facilities at VA Medical Center, San Francisco, California; VA Puget Sound, Seattle, Washington; and VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California. This project was funded by a grant from University of San Francisco Faculty Development Funds.

This article is dedicated to the nurses who work to decrease the suffering of their patients with auditory hallucinations.

Address correspondence to Martha D. Buffum, DNSc, RN, PMHCNS-BC, Associate Chief Nurse for Research, VA Medical Center (118), 4150 Clement Street, San Francisco, CA 94121; e-mail: Martha.Buffum@va.gov.

doi:10.3928/02793695-20090730-01



Psychiatric Nurses’ Decision to Restrain: The Association Between Empowerment and Individual Factors

Pamela L. Lindsey, DNSc, RN

ABSTRACT

The use of restraints in all health care settings has come under increased scrutiny in recent years. Although the organizational context has been suggested as a possible influence on restraint use, few researchers have examined whether organizational factors affect use of restraints and nurses’ decisions to restrain patients hospitalized in psychiatric facilities. The purpose of this study was to examine the association of nurses’ work empowerment (an indicator of organizational culture) with nurses’ decision to restrain. This study also examined the association between individual characteristics of the patient and of the nurses with nurses’ decision to restrain. Lastly, this study examined the decision patterns used by psychiatric nurses in response to patient situations in which restraint might be considered.

AUTHOR

Dr. Lindsey is Assistant Professor, Illinois State University, Normal, Illinois.

The author discloses that she has no significant financial interests in any product or class of products discussed directly or indirectly in this activity, including research support.

The author acknowledges her dissertation committee: Dr. Kathleen Delaney (chair), Rush University College of Nursing; Dr. Mary Johnson, Rush University College of Nursing; Dr. Ann Minnick, Vanderbilt University School of Nursing; and Dr. Mary Ann Boyd, Southern Illinois University Edwardsville School of Nursing.

Address correspondence to Pamela L. Lindsey, DNSc, RN, Assistant Professor, Illinois State University, Campus Box 5810, Normal, IL 61790; e-mail: pllinds@ilstu.edu.

doi:10.3928/02793695-20090730-02


38.107.191.92